-
George Joseph authored
If an error occurs during a bridge impart it's possible that the "bridge_after" callback might try to run before control_swap_channel_in_bridge has been signalled to continue. Since control_swap_channel_in_bridge is holding the control lock and the callback needs it, a deadlock will occur. * control_swap_channel_in_bridge now only holds the control lock while it's actually modifying the control structure and releases it while the bridge impart is running. * bridge_after_cb is now tolerant of impart failures. Change-Id: Ifd239aa93955b3eb475521f61e284fcb0da2c3b3
George Joseph authoredIf an error occurs during a bridge impart it's possible that the "bridge_after" callback might try to run before control_swap_channel_in_bridge has been signalled to continue. Since control_swap_channel_in_bridge is holding the control lock and the callback needs it, a deadlock will occur. * control_swap_channel_in_bridge now only holds the control lock while it's actually modifying the control structure and releases it while the bridge impart is running. * bridge_after_cb is now tolerant of impart failures. Change-Id: Ifd239aa93955b3eb475521f61e284fcb0da2c3b3