Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 3e6923c3 authored by Jonathan Rose's avatar Jonathan Rose
Browse files

unit tests: test_voicemail_api leaks stringfields from snapshots

(closes issue ASTERISK-22414)
Reported by: Corey Farrell
Patches:
    test_voicemail_api-leaks-11.patch uploaded by coreyfarrell (license 5909)
........

Merged revisions 398285 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/11
........

Merged revisions 398286 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/12


git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@398287 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
parent 64924d72
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -382,7 +382,10 @@ static struct ast_vm_msg_snapshot *test_vm_api_create_mock_snapshot(const char *
snprintf(msg_id_buf, sizeof(msg_id_buf), "%ld-%d", (long)time(NULL), ast_str_hash(msg_id_hash));
if ((snapshot = ast_calloc(1, sizeof(*snapshot)))) {
ast_string_field_init(snapshot, 128);
if (ast_string_field_init(snapshot, 128)) {
ast_free(snapshot);
return NULL;
}
ast_string_field_set(snapshot, msg_id, msg_id_buf);
ast_string_field_set(snapshot, exten, exten);
ast_string_field_set(snapshot, callerid, callerid);
......@@ -390,6 +393,18 @@ static struct ast_vm_msg_snapshot *test_vm_api_create_mock_snapshot(const char *
return snapshot;
}
/*!
* \internal
* \brief Destroy a mock snapshot object
*/
static void test_vm_api_destroy_mock_snapshot(struct ast_vm_msg_snapshot *snapshot)
{
if (snapshot) {
ast_string_field_free_memory(snapshot);
ast_free(snapshot);
}
}
/*!
* \internal
* \brief Make a voicemail mailbox folder based on the values provided in a message snapshot
......@@ -620,10 +635,10 @@ static int test_vm_api_test_setup(void)
|| !((msg_three = test_vm_api_create_mock_snapshot("default", "test_vm_api_2345", "\"Phil\" <2000>")))
|| !((msg_four = test_vm_api_create_mock_snapshot("default", "test_vm_api_2345", "\"Bill\" <3000>")))) {
ast_log(AST_LOG_ERROR, "Failed to create mock snapshots for test\n");
ast_free(msg_one);
ast_free(msg_two);
ast_free(msg_three);
ast_free(msg_four);
test_vm_api_destroy_mock_snapshot(msg_one);
test_vm_api_destroy_mock_snapshot(msg_two);
test_vm_api_destroy_mock_snapshot(msg_three);
test_vm_api_destroy_mock_snapshot(msg_four);
return 1;
}
......@@ -631,10 +646,10 @@ static int test_vm_api_test_setup(void)
if (ast_vm_test_create_user("default", "test_vm_api_1234")
|| ast_vm_test_create_user("default", "test_vm_api_2345")) {
ast_log(AST_LOG_ERROR, "Failed to create test voicemail users\n");
ast_free(msg_one);
ast_free(msg_two);
ast_free(msg_three);
ast_free(msg_four);
test_vm_api_destroy_mock_snapshot(msg_one);
test_vm_api_destroy_mock_snapshot(msg_two);
test_vm_api_destroy_mock_snapshot(msg_three);
test_vm_api_destroy_mock_snapshot(msg_four);
/* Note that the cleanup macro will ensure that any test user that
* was successfully created is removed
*/
......@@ -687,7 +702,7 @@ static int test_vm_api_test_setup(void)
* up the object here instead */
ast_log(AST_LOG_ERROR, "Failed to store voicemail %s/%s\n",
"default", test_snapshots[i]->exten);
ast_free(test_snapshots[i]);
test_vm_api_destroy_mock_snapshot(test_snapshots[i]);
test_snapshots[i] = NULL;
res = 1;
}
......@@ -703,7 +718,7 @@ static void test_vm_api_test_teardown(void)
/* Remove our test message snapshots */
for (i = 0; i < TOTAL_SNAPSHOTS; ++i) {
test_vm_api_remove_voicemail(test_snapshots[i]);
ast_free(test_snapshots[i]);
test_vm_api_destroy_mock_snapshot(test_snapshots[i]);
test_snapshots[i] = NULL;
}
......@@ -853,6 +868,7 @@ AST_TEST_DEFINE(voicemail_api_nominal_snapshot)
VM_API_INT_VERIFY(2, test_mbox_snapshot->total_msg_num);
VM_API_SNAPSHOT_MSG_VERIFY(test_snapshots[0], test_mbox_snapshot, "INBOX", 0);
VM_API_SNAPSHOT_MSG_VERIFY(test_snapshots[1], test_mbox_snapshot, "INBOX", 1);
ast_vm_mailbox_snapshot_destroy(test_mbox_snapshot);
ast_test_status_update(test, "Test retrieving message 1, 0 from Old and INBOX of test_vm_1234 ordered by time desc\n");
VM_API_SNAPSHOT_CREATE("test_vm_api_1234", "default", "INBOX", 1, AST_VM_SNAPSHOT_SORT_BY_TIME, 1);
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment