Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 8f585922 authored by Matthew Jordan's avatar Matthew Jordan
Browse files

res_pjsip_session/res_pjsip_sdp_rtp: Be more tolerant of offers

When an inbound SDP offer is received, Asterisk currently makes a few
incorrection assumptions:

(1) If the offer contains more than a single audio/video stream, Asterisk will
    reject the entire stream with a 488. This is an overly strict response;
    generally, Asterisk should accept the media streams that it can accept and
    decline the others.
(2) If the offer contains a declined media stream, Asterisk will attempt to
    process it anyway. This can result in attempting to match format
    capabilities on a declined media stream, leading to a 488. Asterisk should
    simply ignore declined media streams.
(3) Asterisk will currently attempt to handle offers with AVPF with
    use_avpf=No/AVP with use_avpf=Yes. This mismatch results in invalid SDP
    answers being sent in response. If there is a mismatch between the media
    type being offered and the configuration, Asterisk must reject the offer
    with a 488.

This patch does the following:
* Asterisk will accept SDP offers with at least one media stream that it can
  use. Some WARNING messages have been dropped to NOTICEs as a result.
* Asterisk will not accept an offer with a media type that doesn't match its
  configuration.
* Asterisk will ignore declined media streams properly.

#SIPit31

Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4063/

ASTERISK-24122 #close
Reported by: James Van Vleet

ASTERISK-24381 #close
Reported by: Matt Jordan
........

Merged revisions 425868 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/12
........

Merged revisions 425879 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/13


git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@425881 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
parent 0d0e38a0
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment