What I did not originally see in my previous commit was that even though the
next digit could be detected before the previous was considered ended, the
detection of the next digit effectively ends the detection of the previous.
Therefore, the length moves in lockstep with the digit, and no separate counter
is needed for the length alone.

(closes issue #17371)
 Reported by: alecdavis

(closes issue #17474)
 Reported by: kenner


git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@268456 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3