Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
user avatar
Kevin Harwell authored
If a 183 with sdp response is receive without a To tag the sdp is not
negotiated. According to RFC 3261 section 12.1.2 while a To tag is required,
the client needs to still be able to handle the missing tag case for
backwards compatibility.

This patch, accepted by and applied to pjproject, makes it so if an incoming
180/183 with SDP comes in without a To tag it gets appropriately handled.

ASTERISK-27442 #close

Change-Id: Ic9d6b01e05e8f4874eebbd7adfe05d932025d203
db21f7f2
History